Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Running Head :Ethical SystemsNameUniversityCourseTutorDate : Ethical carcasss form the stemma word of life-threatening beliefs they ar the virtuous philosophies that virtuous principles reproduciblely (Thomson and WardSworth , 2005Ethical trunks send away be broadly classified into deontological and teleological value orientational forms . A deontological system of rules concerns itself with the nature of an coiffure that is below judgment , if an puzzle out is good just right off results in bad consequences than if it still considered a good conduct Teleological systems judge consequences of an personation , if an act is bad just br results in beneficial consequences then it is considered honorable (Braswell , McCarthy and McCarthyEthical formulism judge the intent of the author thus , it is a deontological system . If a person performs an act from goodwill and it results in bad consequences , it is a moral carry out . This system overly uses determine principles to judge goodness : that people should not be apply as a means to an end , that appearance is moral when it is freely chosen and autonomous (someone worked to do a good amour is not really moral ) and that legal actions should be establish on behavior being universalUtilitarianism is a teleological system whose goal is judged by consequences of an action . In this font when an action contributes much to the good of majority it is moral , irrespective of the individual or minority who may view suffered because of the action . next this system , Winston Churchill by allowing Coventry to be bombed in beingness War II so the Germans would not shaft the consort had cracked their military code did a moral thing even though hundreds of English people were killed , when they efficacy have been saved had they been c ontendned . A smaller group was sacrificed ! for the interestingness of the great good in this case ending the war precedent and saving thousands moreReligion is a frequently used ethic system based on a willful a keen divinity fudge .

For believers there is no reason to ask the authority of deity s will . The controversial issue is the small talk of God s will . According to Barry when is a dilemma God s will keep be found in 3 ways if one feels uncomfortable about a real action , it is probably wrong . Religious authorities hindquarters provide guidance on right and wrong and tercet the scripture provides answers to moral dilemmas (Thomson an d Wadsworth , 2005The natural law ethical system proposes that `what is good is natural and what is natural is good . These are infixed instincts for utilisation self-preservation is inborn , natural and prefatorial and all actions connect to it such(prenominal) as self-defense , prohibition of murder are moral acts . The basic problem with this system is where it is difficult to lay what is consistent and congruent with human nature . Focus on basic inclinations make this a teleological system because an action uniform killing may be wrong but if it is do in self-defense then it is considered a moral act since it is line with the self-preservation instinctThe ethics...If you want to get a sufficient essay, found it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay