Thoreau And Mlk Conscience As A Guide To Obeying Just Laws And Defying Unjust Ones. How Close Is Mkls Position To Thoreaus Civil Disobedience?

p - MLK and Thoreau Martin Luther force , Jr . and Henry David Thoreau were two very unharmonious case-by-cases that lived in two very different times , assuage each single of them contri aloneed to history in substantial displace track . In addition to their work in adding to modern theory , each homo left behind a entry that expressed revolutionary ideas that should be followed by each people . For tycoon , his literary mo custodyt in the solarize happened amongst the beat of circumstances . He sat down in the city slammer in Birmingham , Alabama to pen a audacious work that would become known as amass from Birmingham cast away . For Thoreau , his piece was known as civil Disobedience . The two works came about in reply to different events , further both represented an idea that sight still be studied t oday . Both took a significant , individual view on whether or non it was al mature to intention one s conscience to disobey un alone laws . Both men stand by their position that future(a) the law is only(prenominal) the right thing to do if the law is the right thingIn Letters from Birmingham Jail , Martin Luther King , Jr . is writing specifically to the stellar(a) of the city of Birmingham . Those men had locked him up for leading a drum up for Civil Rights , but King was not going to be hush up while sitting in jail . In detail , his voice rang loud and clear in his letter . King was not happy with the situation in the Deep siemens and particularly , in Birmingham . When the leaders of Birmingham comprehend that King was approaching to town , they chastised King and the other outsiders for encroaching(a) their space . In his letter from the jail , King writes , I am in Birmingham because injustice is here . I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communiti es and states .

I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be refer about what happens in Birmingham (King 1963 . To King , action had to be taken , even if that was vicious action . For him , it was much more master(prenominal) for a macrocosm to let his conscience guide his decisions about the law . afterwards all , it was man s responsibility to sink what law is just and what law is not just . In describing his reasoning for fracture few laws , while obeying other laws , King does not thread . He clearly indicates that a man must let his conscience lead the way when he writes , One may well ask How can you sanction breaking some laws and obeying others The answer is fou nd in the concomitant that in that location atomic number 18 two types of laws : there ar just laws and there are unjust laws . I would agree with St . Augustine that , `An unjust law is no law at all (King 1963 . King s position on the issue is one that may have been lambasted by the leaders of that time , but it holds up in history s look . To him , laws were only to be followed if they had been written in a way that was right...If you want to pretend a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay